As an academic researcher navigating the complex world of academia, you may often find yourself choosing safe, predictable projects over bold, high-risk ones. While the allure of groundbreaking discoveries can be enticing, many researchers lean towards projects with more guaranteed outcomes. A recent study published in PLOS Biology by Kevin Gross of North Carolina State University and Carl Bergstrom of the University of Washington discusses why this is such a common trend and how it impacts your personal research journey.
The Pressure to Publish
One of the most significant factors influencing your decision to choose safe over risky projects is the pressure to publish. The "publish or perish" culture is a reality many researchers face, and your career advancement depends heavily on your publication record. Safe projects are more likely to yield tangible, publishable results, allowing you to maintain a steady flow of papers. Riskier projects, while potentially more rewarding, come with the possibility of failure or prolonged timelines, which may hurt your ability to meet publication expectations.
As Gross and Bergstrom point out, the academic system tends to reward quantity over quality, which can make it difficult for you to justify spending time on a high-risk project that might not yield results. This pressure can lead you to prioritize projects that are more likely to succeed, even if they don’t push the boundaries of knowledge as much as riskier options might.
Securing Funding for Your Research
As a researcher, securing funding is critical to your work. However, funding agencies often prefer to back projects that are more likely to succeed, which can make it challenging to propose high-risk research. Gross and Bergstrom’s study highlights how funding bodies are often risk-averse, focusing on projects with predictable outcomes.
This creates a dilemma for you: do you propose a safe project with a higher chance of funding success, or a riskier one that may struggle to secure financial support? Knowing that your future work relies on obtaining grants, you may feel compelled to pursue safer options to ensure your research is sustainable, even if it means sacrificing innovation.
Playing It Safe in a Competitive Field
The competitive nature of academia can make it difficult for you to take risks. With limited tenure positions, fellowships, and recognition to go around, you may feel pressure to consistently deliver results that bolster your reputation and career. As Gross and Bergstrom note, the current academic system rewards researchers who can demonstrate regular, incremental progress rather than those who gamble on a high-risk project that may take years to pay off—if it pays off at all.
By focusing on safer projects, you can ensure you maintain a competitive edge in your field. However, this strategy can come at the cost of potential groundbreaking discoveries that could truly set your work apart.
The Fear of Failure
It's natural to fear failure, especially when your career and reputation are on the line. The study by Gross and Bergstrom underscores how this fear plays a significant role in why individual researchers often shy away from risky projects. The potential for failure not only impacts your publication record and ability to secure funding but can also lead to self-doubt and hesitation in pursuing unconventional ideas.
However, failure is an inherent part of scientific discovery, and the most innovative breakthroughs often come after repeated setbacks. While it’s difficult to embrace failure, Gross and Bergstrom suggest that fostering a culture where risk-taking is encouraged and failure is seen as part of the learning process could help alleviate this fear.
Balancing Risk and Reward in Your Career
So, how can you, as an individual researcher, balance the need to take risks with the desire for a steady career progression? Gross and Bergstrom suggest a few strategies that could help you push boundaries without sacrificing your professional stability:
- Diversify your research portfolio: Pursuing a mix of safe and risky research projects allows you to balance immediate results with long-term innovation. You can keep your publication record strong while still exploring riskier ideas that might lead to significant breakthroughs.
- Seek specialized funding: Some funding agencies or programs specifically support high-risk, high-reward research. Look for grants that value innovation and creativity, and tailor your proposals to highlight the transformative potential of your work.
- Collaborate: Partnering with other researchers or institutions on risky projects can spread out the risk and make it more feasible to explore groundbreaking ideas. Collaboration allows you to leverage shared resources and expertise while maintaining your own research agenda.
Embracing Innovation in Research
Ultimately, the decision to pursue safe or risky projects depends on your personal goals, the structure of your institution, and the nature of your field. While safe projects may offer short-term stability, they may limit your potential for truly innovative work. Gross and Bergstrom argue that systemic changes—such as revising how researchers are evaluated or adjusting funding priorities—could help create an environment where you feel more comfortable taking risks.
For individual researchers like you, the key lies in striking a balance: embracing risks when they have the potential to transform your field while ensuring that your career remains on a steady path.
About eContent Pro
Based in Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA, eContent Pro offers high-quality end-to-end editorial and publishing services, ensuring seamless workflows through the eContent Pro Business Enterprise Management System (BEMS), fast turnaround times, competitive pricing, and exceptional customer service. Since 1994, we have supported commercial publishers, university/library presses, organizations, and societies by streamlining their publishing workflow with innovative publishing solutions.
